AskDefine | Define delict

User Contributed Dictionary



delictum, fault, from neuter of delictus, past participle of delinquere.


dī-līkt'; di-'likt, dE-


  1. A wrongful act. A tort.
  2. The branch of law dealing in delicts.

See also




See also

Extensive Definition

Delict is a concept of civil law which is used to some degree in many civil law legal systems. However, due to the large number of civil law systems in the world, it is hard to state any generalities about the concept.

Delict as a Wilful Wrong

In the most narrowly construed sense, delict is a Latin word and a legal term, which, in some civil law systems, signifies a wilful wrong, similar to the common law concept of tort though differing in many substantive ways. It is to be differentiated from quasi-delict which is an unintentional wrong, similar though differing from the common law concept of negligence. The term is found particularly in Scots Law.

German speaking countries

By contrast, the civil law of German-speaking countries does not differentiate between delict and quasi-delict in the sense described above. Under German Deliktsrecht, referring to damages arising outside contract, claims to damages can arise from either intentional or negligent infliction of harm. Under § 823 BGB, damages can either be based on harm inflicted either on an object protected by law (Rechtsgut) such as life, health or property, or on the violation of a law protecting a certain legal interest.
However, § 826 BGB (and the similar Austrian § 1295 Abs 2 ABGB) compare closely to delict. Under this provision, someone who intentionally inflicts harm on another person in a way violating morality (gute Sitten) is liable for damages.

South Africa

The South African Legal System also uses the law of delicts as opposed to torts. The Law of Delict is recognised as comprising of five generic elements that have to be satisfied before a claimant can be successful. They are:
  1. Conduct - which may consist of either a commission (positive action) or an omission (the failure to take required action).
  2. Wrongfulness - the conduct complained of must be legally reprehensible. This is usually assessed with reference to the legal convictions of the community.
  3. Fault - once the wrongfulness of the conduct is established, it is necessary to establish whether or not it is blameworthy.
  4. Causation - the conduct that the claimant complains of must have caused damage, in this regard both factual causation and legal causation are assessed. The purpose of legal causation is to limit the scope of factual causation, if the consequence of the action is too remote to have been foreseen by an objective, reasonable person the defendant will escape liability.
  5. Damage - finally the conduct must have resulted in some form of loss or harm to the claimant in order for them to have a claim. This damage can take the form of patrimonial loss (a reduction in a person's financial position, such as is the case where the claimant incurred medical expenses) or non-patrimonial damages (damages that cannot be related to a person's financial estate, but compensation for something like pain and suffering.)

Scots Law of Delict

See also


  • For more information on the Law of Delict in South Africa see Neethling et al: Delict or McKerron: Delict.
delict in Czech: Trestný čin
delict in German: Delikt
delict in Lithuanian: Deliktas
delict in Polish: Czyn niedozwolony
delict in Russian: Деликт
delict in Slovak: Trestný čin
delict in Swedish: Delikt
delict in Ukrainian: Делікт
Privacy Policy, About Us, Terms and Conditions, Contact Us
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
Material from Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Dict
Valid HTML 4.01 Strict, Valid CSS Level 2.1